I. Core Cause Analysis
(1) Underlying Logic of Ripples Caused by Abnormal Ink Viscosity
1. Issues with Low-Viscosity Ink
When the ink viscosity falls below the standard range, intermolecular cohesion becomes insufficient, leading to “tailing” and “ink bleeding diffusion” after ejection:
- During printhead movement, low-viscosity ink cannot stabilize quickly. As adjacent droplets merge, irregular ripple patterns resembling water waves are formed.
- At the same time, low viscosity increases the number of satellite droplets (>3 per 1,000 drops). These tiny droplets randomly attach to the color block surface, further intensifying the ripple effect.
Main causes of low viscosity include:
- Temperature increase (viscosity decreases by ~0.25 cP per 1°C rise)
- Excess solvent
- Overuse of surfactants
2. Issues with High-Viscosity Ink
When viscosity exceeds the standard range, ink fluidity decreases, and the piezoelectric actuator must provide greater driving force:
- Uneven droplet velocity (CV > 8%) leads to inaccurate landing positions, forming “accumulation ripples.”
- High viscosity prolongs the decay time of nozzle pressure oscillation. In multi-pulse printing, residual vibrations from the previous waveform overlap with subsequent pulses, causing droplet deviation (phase deviation > 5°) and resulting in periodic ripples.
Main causes of high viscosity include:
- Excess pigment concentration (volume fraction φ > 0.2)
- Overuse of thickeners
- Pigment flocculation due to long-term storage
3. Impact of Poor Viscosity Stability
Environmental fluctuations (e.g., RH > 70% causing moisture absorption in water-based inks) or failure in temperature control of the ink circulation system lead to real-time viscosity variations (> ±1 cP).
- This dynamic instability prevents the printhead from maintaining a stable jetting state.
- Droplet volume deviation exceeds ±3%, resulting in random ripple defects.

A4 Print Result — Before Optimization
A4 Print Result — After Optimization
(2) Key Issues of Waveform Parameter Mismatch
1. Imbalance Between Pulse Width and Viscosity
The waveform pulse width (t₍fire₎) is the key parameter controlling droplet volume:
- For low-viscosity ink, if pulse width is not reduced (still using standard 3.5 μs), droplet volume becomes too large (>10 pL), causing uneven spreading.
- For high-viscosity ink, if pulse width is not increased (<5 μs), droplet ejection becomes insufficient, resulting in “intermittent jetting ripples.”
2. Conflict Between Pulse Interval and Residual Vibration
In multi-pulse printing, waveform intervals must be adjusted according to viscosity:
- Low-viscosity ink: requires longer intervals (+15–25 μs) to avoid droplet overlap
- High-viscosity ink: requires shorter intervals (−30–50 μs) to utilize residual pressure
If not properly adjusted:
- Pressure oscillations at the nozzle surface do not decay to zero
- Subsequent pulses are disturbed
- Droplet roundness decreases (aspect ratio < 0.95), forming ripples
3. Improper Waveform Type Selection
- Basic single-pulse waveforms cannot suppress residual vibration or satellite droplet generation
- Droplet roundness is only ~0.85
- Unoptimized multi-pulse waveforms can cause pulse interference, resulting in droplet velocity fluctuation > 0.5 m/s, further aggravating ripple defects
II. Targeted Solutions
(1) Ink Viscosity Optimization
1. Precise Viscosity Calibration
- Low-viscosity ink:
- Add 0.1–0.3% thickener (e.g., Hydroxyethyl Cellulose, HEC)
- Supplement high-viscosity base ink
- Adjust viscosity to 8–10 cP
- Reduce surfactant dosage and control solvent ratio
- High-viscosity ink:
- Add appropriate diluents (e.g., ethanol)
- Adjust viscosity to 10–12 cP
- Filter out pigment flocculation
- Control pigment volume fraction φ < 0.18
- Calibration tool:
- Use a rotational rheometer (shear rate 10⁴ s⁻¹)
- Ensure viscosity deviation ≤ ±0.5 cP
2. Viscosity Stability Control
- Environmental control:
- Temperature: 23 ± 2°C
- Humidity: 50 ± 10% RH
- Equipment optimization:
- Use multi-tank ink circulation systems (e.g., Keyence MK-G series)
- Real-time viscosity sensors (±0.1 cP accuracy)
- Heating/cooling modules for automatic compensation
- Enable automatic nozzle cleaning
- Ink management:
- Use within 3 months after opening
- Shake before use to ensure uniform dispersion
(2) Waveform Parameter Optimization
1. Viscosity-Based Waveform Adjustment
| Viscosity (cP) (EPSON) | Pulse Width (μs) | Interval (μs) | Voltage (V) | Phase Compensation (°) |
| 2–3 (Low) | 1.5–2.5 | Base + 20 | Base − 5% | 0–2 |
| 3–5 (Standard) | 3.5 (Base) | Base | Base | 0 |
| 5–8 (High) | 5–8 | Base − 40 | Base + 10% | 3–5 |
2. Waveform Type Optimization
- Recommended: Trailing-edge W-type waveform
- Suppresses residual vibration
- Droplet roundness ≈ 1 (optimal 0.997)
- Satellite droplets ≤ 1 per 1,000
- Significantly reduces ripple defects
- Multi-pulse printing:
- Use phase synchronization correction technology
- Prevent waveform interference
3. Dynamic Adjustment Mechanism
- Establish a viscosity–waveform linkage model based on real-time feedback:
- When viscosity changes by ±0.5 cP:
- Pulse width ±0.3 μs
- Voltage ±1 V
- When viscosity changes by ±0.5 cP:
Example:
- Using 15 cP ink
- Droplet velocity CV reduced from 8.7% → 2.3%
- Ripple defects completely eliminated
III. Verification and Debugging Process
- Basic Testing
- Measure viscosity with viscometer
- Observe droplets using high-speed camera (>1000 fps)
- Requirements:
- Roundness ≥ 0.98
- Satellite droplets ≤ 1 per 1,000
- Sample Printing
- Print 10 cm × 10 cm solid color block
- Inspect under microscope (50×)
- Requirement:
- < 2 ripple lines per cm
- No visible defects
- Stability Testing
- Continuous printing for 1 hour
- Measure every 10 minutes
- Requirements:
- Viscosity fluctuation ≤ ±0.3 cP
- Droplet volume deviation ≤ ±2%
- Final Verification
- Use spectrophotometer to measure uniformity
- Requirement:
- ΔE < 1.5 (lower = better uniformity)